Given that I have no money, so little that I can't afford groceries right now and was reduced to eating a package of Poka Sticks from my stocking (yep, my Christmas stocking) for lunch, I don't regularly (i.e. ever) read the financial or business section of any paper. My eye was caught, however, by this article today in the Toronto Star, Why won't women give up their cell phones. Curiosity was peaked and, like a frat boy in a library, I decided to try something new and clicked the link to the Moneyville section (their tag of Welcome to Financial Freedom made me feel like I was somehow trespassing, not at all like the Debt is Manageable ads for a bankruptcy company I see on the subway which always fill me with a youthful optimism).
Elle MacPherson, photographed by Sharif Hamza for Love Magazine |
Blair Waldorf: Not Without My |
The article went on to explain that in a Mastercard-sponsored survey, 2000 Canadian women were given a list, compiled, it would seem, by Cathy, of things to go without and cell-phones were deemed to be more necessary than morning coffee, chocolate, exercise and clothes. That's right, women who said that they'd give up female stereotype staples before giving up their cellphones got an article decrying in a hyperbolic Mrs. Lovejoy kind of way, that WOMEN WILL NOT GIVE UP THEIR PHONES FOR ANYTHING EVER IN A GAJILLION YEARS!
I for one am really glad that The Star broke this story -- Toronto, nay, the world needs to know that women would rather have their phones than a chocolate bar.
No comments:
Post a Comment